Trump/Uni-party/Saul Alinsky’s Rules

Don't dismiss what's going on. We have been used and abused by both parties

I have sadly seen some of the young fighters against the Neo-Marxists and their attempted takeover of the UNited States, claim that “We’re long past Alinsky.” How sad is their belief and how it shows the inexperience through lack of historical references. Winston Churchill once said, “If you don’t know where you’ve been, you don’t where you’re going.” When I saw a Truth Social post from Trump yesterday, as it was referenced in a Col. MacGregor interview on the George Galloway Show, I felt I could not ignore what I’ve known through first hand experiences and I had to write a Substack over it.

My writing this, will not stop the conjured war of current day, however, if we get out of this mess, I pray my fellow Americans, will stop participating in this Federalist System of the highest bidder gets the most political power.

In that interview, I heard two items discussed in terms of the Israeli Lobby and how they control our national political system. They also reminded me of two points you can find in Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. In the past twenty years, my experience with the Republican Party from the level of campaigns and local Party meetings. I discovered that the republican Party, acts just like the Democrat Party. They are a Uni-Party. I’m not the first person to use that description, but let us just say, that they operate just like each other and it’s always over money and corporatism. The big shocker, was that how closely the Republican Party, uses rules for Radicals!

Getting to it, the Trump quote is as follows from Truth Social:

“It’s not politically correct to use the term, “Regime Change,” but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime Change??? MIGA!!! 6-22-25 4:55 PM

How would that equate to Rules for Radicals?

Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals, in his “Eleventh Rule” chapter Of Means and Ends, he quotes author Walt Whitman commenting on decision to move into Civil War unknowingly can generate a great gain. “The goal once named cannot be countermanded.” Alinsky then writes, “It has been previously noted that the wise man of action knows that frequently in the stream of action of means towards ends, whole new and unexpected ends are among the major results of the action. From a Civil War fought as a means to preserve the Union came the end of slavery.”

Compare that to what trump posted last night. We attacked and it wasn’t intended to give “regime change” but if that happens, doesn’t that also support the means to the ends?

The Colonel then related a scene from the past Republican Convention, where a large Israeli flag was displayed in the convention hall and a person from the Republicans addressed the convention and tried to get a chant started that sounded like Make Israel Great Again. What is that doing in our domestic politics? We all complained every time China gets involved and was never acted on. Foreign entanglements!

I also sour at watching the people of today, scoff at the people founders this nation. As if they came directly out of caves and never had any education or connection with the human race before 1776. When George Washington, declared that the US needed to stay out of foreign entanglements, he wasn’t speaking from a position of isolationism. He speaking from the experience of warfare and the cost of it.

So, somebody in the Republican Party, decided to apply another directive from Rules for Radicals! When that speaker at the Convention, tried to hijack the meaning of the convention and make it their own about Israel, that plan speaks to this: The Genesis of Tactic Proxy, page 168-169, “… They all came together on July 14, 1939. July 14, Bastille Day! Their Bastille Day, the day they deliberately and symbolically selected to join together to storm the barricades of unemployment, rotten housing, disease, delinquency and demoralization.

That’s the way it reads. What really happened is that July 14 was selected because it was the one day the public park fieldhouse was clear-the on day that the labor unions had no scheduled meetings-the day that many priests thought was best-the one day that the late Bishop Sheil was free. There wasn’t a thought of Bastille Day in any of our minds.

That day at a press conference before the convention came to order a reporter asked me, “Don’t you think it’s somewhat too revolutionary to deliberately select Bastille Say for your first convention?” I tried to cover my surprise but I thought, “How wonderful! What a windfall!” I answered, “Not at all. It is fitting that we do so and that’s why we did it.”

I quickly informed all the speakers about “Bastille Day” and it became the keynote of nearly every speech. Ans so history records it as a “calculated, planned” tactic.”

True, the recent Republican Convention, didn’t have an Israeli event withing an event by accident as Alinsky describes, however the lesson from Alinsky in the “tactic” is to look for such opportunities and the case of the past Republican Convention, it is worse than an accident. It was done intentionally.

Once you read Alinsky, you cannot un-read him. You will always see it when it’s used and I’ve seen the GOP make the Democrat Party look like amateurs in the use of Rules for Radicals.

Pick up a copy of Reveille for Radicals and Rules for Radicals. It’s better to know it and not fall for it as “normal” any longer.

Yours in liberty,

Vince